Does Brandlight support prompt visibility by project?

Can prompt visibility be restricted by project or campaign using Brandlight’s governance features?

Yes. Brandlight enables restricting prompt visibility by project or campaign through enterprise governance that scopes access to specific contexts. This is achieved with core controls that anchor who can view or modify prompts within defined boundaries. The approach supports auditable trails and drift detection to keep messaging consistent with brand guidelines.

Key capabilities include RBAC to assign project- or campaign-level roles, SSO to unify authentication across systems, and multi-domain tracking to enforce domain-specific visibility. API-first data pipelines provide reliable, versioned access while reducing scraping risk, and remediation workflows link visibility to content calendars and knowledge bases to maintain alignment with editorial plans and governance standards (GDPR/SOC 2 Type 2). See Brandlight governance overview for details on how these controls fit together.

For a practical example, a marketing team can lock visibility to a single campaign while product teams access other campaigns under separate roles, with drift remediation automatically routed to relevant brand assets and CMS workflows. Brandlight’s governance references, such as AI Topic Maps and AI Search Performance, help structure this scoping and ensure consistent enforcement across channels.

How do per-project access controls work with multi-domain tracking and SSO?

Per-project access controls are grounded in a combined approach that ties authentication to project scope. Multi-domain tracking provides the boundary across domains, while SSO ensures a single, verifiable identity that travels with access rights. RBAC assigns precise permissions for each project or campaign, enabling consistent governance while preserving auditability across environments.

In practice, these elements work together to prevent cross-project leakage and drift, supporting compliant handling of data and prompts. The governance stack maintains centralized policy enforcement, logs actions for review, and aligns with enterprise standards such as GDPR and SOC 2 Type 2 to support scalable, secure deployment in complex ecosystems.

See Brandlight governance overview for a concise framing of how these components interact to deliver scoped, auditable visibility.

What role do RBAC and remediation workflows play in campaign-level visibility?

RBAC defines who can view or change prompts tied to a specific campaign, ensuring that only authorized roles can affect messaging. Remediation workflows translate drift or misalignment into concrete actions—such as content rewrites, updates to the knowledge base, or prompt refinements—held to audit trails and version histories to preserve accountability.

The combination of RBAC and remediation workflows supports governance across CMS and BI pipelines, enabling consistent, timely updates that reflect brand guidelines. Drift detection flags misalignments, and remediation tasks tie back to the editorial calendar to maintain campaign discipline while preserving governance and traceability.

For a governance reference that anchors these practices, see Brandlight governance overview.

What data-pipeline considerations matter for per-project visibility?

Access-controlled, API-first data pipelines are preferred because they offer reliability, forward compatibility, and clear boundaries for project-specific visibility. Pipelines should support versioned prompts, data lineage, and drift monitoring to ensure ongoing accountability across multi-month campaigns. Remediation outputs map to CMS and knowledge bases, enabling consistent messaging and straightforward attribution to each project or campaign.

Governance guidance emphasizes maintaining data boundaries, auditable histories, and controlled data movement, with prompt provenance and change histories central to accountability. This approach helps ensure that per-project visibility stays aligned with brand standards as models evolve and campaigns iterate.

See Brandlight governance overview for a contextual reference on how data pipelines underpin per-project access and remediation.

What audit trails exist for changes to prompt visibility?

Audit trails are a core element of Brandlight’s governance, recording who changed what, when, and why. Logs cover RBAC actions, SSO sessions, and prompt modifications, providing a verifiable history that supports compliance with GDPR and SOC 2 Type 2. Central dashboards summarize visibility across projects and campaigns, enabling end-to-end traceability of remediation actions and messaging updates.

These trails underpin accountability and governance, helping teams demonstrate policy adherence and quickly investigate any drift or misalignment. For a governance reference that contextualizes these practices, see Brandlight governance overview.

How does Brandlight handle drift and remediation at campaign level?

Brandlight continuously monitors drift against brand guidelines, utilizing AI Topic Maps and AI Search Performance to detect deviations in tone, citations, and factual alignment. Remediation workflows trigger content rewrites, knowledge-base updates, and prompt refinements, with changes routed through CMS and BI pipelines to preserve consistency and attribution across channels.

The approach ties visibility to editorial calendars and campaign timelines, ensuring that updates are timely, traceable, and aligned with governance standards. Ongoing drift remediation is supported by versioned prompts and audit trails, maintaining accountability as campaigns evolve. See Brandlight governance overview for the governance basis of these practices.